Search

CFA: Chartered crypto analysts

The CFA is one of the world's hardest exams, or so they say.

Just Google “world's hardest exam” and you'll find the qualification listed alongside the All Souls Fellowship -- a scholarship test at Oxford that once required applicants to write a three-hour paper on a single word.

Run by the CFA Institute, the certification is a three-year theoretical golden ticket to the Willy Wonka factory of high finance. The tests are notoriously gruelling -- each of its three levels requires a recommended 300 hours of study time -- and junior investment analysts sacrifice the nights of their youth in hope of accelerating their careers.

Often, dreams are dashed: the pass rate for Level 1 stood at only 43 per cent as of last December's exam.

Given its reputation as the high-water mark of financial qualifications, we were surprised yesterday when Bloomberg reported the CFA Institute is adding questions about cryptocurrency and blockchain to the first two levels of its three-part exam. Via Bloomberg:

CFA added the topics, part of a new reading called Fintech in Investment Management, after industry participants showed surging interest in surveys and focus groups.

The questions will appear in the new fintech curriculum, and will be included in the tests starting next summer.

Stephen Horan, managing director of credentialing at the CFA Institute, described the subject matter as “not a passing fad”. That description directly contradicts Alphaville's experience of the blockchain and cryptocurrency scene, which at best seems to resemble an ever-escalating arms race to who can publish the most nonsensical press release. At worst, to quote Obi-Wan Kenobi, it seems to be a wretched hive of scum and villainy.

Not to mention the fact that cryptocurrency prices have collapsed since the hodl highs of December.

So given the crypto-nonsense, why is the CFA Institute getting involved?

It certainly has got nothing to do with the business of the Institute itself. In fact, the qualification has never been more popular.

Exam registrations for all three levels rose 20 per cent to 227,031 for June's exam season, and with 2017's revenues coming in at $312.6m, up 11 per cent from the year before, it is fair to say the CFA Institute is doing just fine.

But perhaps this is also part of the problem. If too many boffins hold the qualification, then there's an existential risk of the CFA becoming just another three letters on a business card, rather than a distinguished badge of financial wizardry. Crypto-questions add another potential layer of complexity for candidates, which could help sift out entrants who struggle with amorphous concepts yet to find useful real-world applications, such as blockchain.

While increasing failure rates may not be the savviest business decision in the short term, given CFA charterholders are required to pay annual fees to continue their membership, finding a balance between recurring revenue and exam difficulty will surely be a priority for the Institute.

Another reason may lie in the qualification's future relevancy. As with all accreditation, whether it is a graduate degree or an MBA, the need to prove a qualifications value to an employer, prospective or current, is clear.

In a world of shifts to algorithmic trading and passive investment vehicles, the fundamental financial skills that the CFA aims to cultivate are arguably losing some of their shine. Employers may ask whether it is a better use of an analyst's time to learn a programming language, such as Python, rather than sinking 1000 hours into figuring out how to calculate modified duration with a Texas Instruments BA II Plus or Hewlett Packard 12C.

The new fintech module in the CFA, which includes questions on big data analysis and robo-advisers (as well as crypto), is clearly designed to cater to these new investment frontiers. But with quantitative hedge funds disregarding financial experience in favour of science doctorates, and assets rapidly flowing into passive vehicles, these skills may become more niche if current trends continue apace.

However, there is one place where we think crypto questions are required: the CFA's famous ethics section.

Luckily, the CFA Institute has obliged. Bloomberg confirmed crypto questions will appear in the ethics quiz, which counts for 15 per cent of level one, so here's a suggestion from us for starters:

1. Your colleague Izzy recommends you invest in the ICO of ToDaMoon coin, a new coin-offering which promises to “make you richer than Croesus but on the blockchain”. What is your response?

a. Great idea Izzy, let's buy and HODL until our deepest and darkest desires are fulfilled.

b. The CFA code of ethics forbids investments in magical 1s and 0s with no clear regulatory framework.

c. We must first read the white paper to make sure the founder has at least 2 months experience mining Bitcoin.

Any suggestions for more CFA ethics questions on crypto are welcome below.

The CFA Institute weren't immediately available for comment. We will update the story if and when they get back to us with a response.

Related Links:
The London School of Cryptonomics
- FT Alphaville
Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
- FT Alphaville

  1. The Netflix dilemma -- updated
  2. Fujitsu's new blockchain offering: really cheap or really expensive?
  3. Nothing But the Shirt on Your Back
  4. Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
  5. How to make a living in the cult of meritocracy
  6. Spotify: Drake-oil salesmen
  7. Oh, the digital humanity
  8. Building a blockchain Britain in Bloxwich, because ...?
  9. Sports are not markets, predictions ain't investment
  10. Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
  11. Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
  12. The node to serfdom
  13. Carney is down with the crypto kids
  14. Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
  15. It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
  16. Don't blame it on the sunshine
  17. In corporate America, brands develop you
  18. One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
  19. Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
  20. Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
  21. Let’s not try make 'crypto chicks' a thing
  22. Tokens all the way down
  23. Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
  24. A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
  25. How to buy Italian fire insurance
  26. Atlas bugged
  27. Inflating inflation
  28. Crypto's most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
  29. Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
  30. Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
  31. In defence of ticket touts
  32. Please don't tell individual investors to buy leveraged loans
  33. RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
  34. Retail is not dead
  35. Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
  36. At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
  37. Egregious expectations - Intelsat edition
  38. Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
  39. Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
  40. Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
  41. Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
  42. “We're very disappointed in you, Spotify”
  43. 'Sex redistribution' and the means of reproduction
  44. Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
  45. No entitlement crisis in America
  46. Free cash flow to whom?
  47. Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
  48. Human capital and the jobs guarantee
  49. This is a tech bubble, when's the crash?
  50. The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
  51. FUD, inglorious FUD
  52. A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
  53. The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
  54. These hedge fund numbers can't be right
  55. The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
  56. Lies, damn lies, and charticles
  57. The world doesn't need more Elon Musks
  58. No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
  59. Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
  60. Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
  61. Amazon is not a bubble
  62. Japan's economic miracle
  63. Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn't like?
  64. Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
  65. Who needs the labels anyway?
  66. Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
  67. No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
  68. No one needs to buy Tesla
  69. How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
  70. Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
  71. Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
  72. The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
  73. Cigarettes are the vice America needs
  74. Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
  75. Musicians, don't just blame the labels for your lack of dough
  76. Giving stock away to staff doesn't absolve share buybacks
  77. A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
  78. Monopoly and its discontents
  79. A State of Mind
  80. America is not the least protectionist country in the world
  81. This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
  82. No Bloomberg, the world's richest people did not lose $114bn...
  83. Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
  84. Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
  85. Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
  86. Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
  87. Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
  88. Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2018. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Read Again Broooh https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/07/18/1531886400000/CFA--Chartered-crypto-analysts/

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "CFA: Chartered crypto analysts"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.