Supreme Court rules for Curtis Flowers, black man tried six times for Mississippi murders - CNBC

This Aug. 3, 2017 photo provided by Mississippi Department of Corrections shows Curtis Flowers, who's murder case has gone to trial six times.

Mississippi Department of Corrections via AP

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of Curtis Flowers, a black man in Mississippi who was tried six times by the same prosecutor for a 1996 quadruple murder.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who wrote the opinion of the court, said the trial court committed "clear error" by concluding that the prosecutor's strike of a black juror was not motivated by discrimination.

The decision reversing Flowers' conviction was 7-2, with conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissenting. Thomas is the court's lone black justice.

The case now could be headed for a seventh trial.

Flowers, who is on death row, alleged that the prosecutor, Doug Evans, intentionally barred African Americans from the jury pool that convicted him of fatally shooting four people at the Tardy Furniture store in Winona, Mississippi.

Evans has prosecuted each of Flowers' trials.

The Supreme Court held in the 1986 case Batson v. Kentucky that purposeful racial discrimination in the selection of a jury is unlawful.

Evans barred 41 out of 43 potential black jurors from Flowers' trials, including five out of six potential black jurors in the sixth trial, Flowers' attorneys said in legal briefs.

The jury in the sixth trial sentenced Flowers to death, and the Mississippi Supreme Court, which had reversed an earlier conviction on the basis of racial discrimination, this time affirmed the conviction.

Kavanaugh wrote that the court's opinion in Flowers' case broke no new legal ground, but instead simply reinforced the decision in Batson.

"The numbers speak loudly," Kavanaugh wrote. "Over the course of the first four trials, there were 36 black prospective jurors against whom the State could have exercised a peremptory strike. The State tried to strike all 36."

The justices seemed to side with Flowers during arguments in March. Those arguments were also notable because Thomas broke his three-year streak of not asking any questions from the bench.

In his dissent, Thomas sharply critiqued the court's decision.

"The majority builds its decision around the narrative that this case has a long history of race discrimination," Thomas wrote. "This narrative might make for an entertaining melodrama, but it has no basis in the record."

Flowers' case was extensively detailed in an APM Reports podcast, "In the Dark," whose reporting detailed the extent to which prosecutors challenged prospective jurors.

The case is formally known as Curtis Giovanni Flowers v. Mississippi, No. 17-9572.

Let's block ads! (Why?)